Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation – A survey

نویسندگان

  • Günther Charwat
  • Wolfgang Dvorák
  • Sarah Alice Gaggl
  • Johannes Peter Wallner
  • Stefan Woltran
چکیده

Within the last decade, abstract argumentation has emerged as a central field in Artificial Intelligence. Besides providing a core formalism for many advanced argumentation systems, abstract argumentation has also served to capture several non-monotonic logics and other AI related principles. Although the idea of abstract argumentation is appealingly simple, several reasoning problems in this formalism exhibit high computational complexity. This calls for advanced techniques when it comes to implementation issues, a challenge which has been recently faced from different angles. In this survey, we give an overview on different methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation and compare their particular features. Moreover, we highlight available state-of-the-art systems for abstract argumentation, which put these methods to practice.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation

Abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) provide the basis for various reasoning problems in the areas of Knowledge Representation and Artificial Intelligence. Efficient evaluation of AFs has thus been identified as an important research challenge. So far, implemented systems for evaluating AFs have either followed a straight-forward reduction-based approach or been limited to certain tractable ...

متن کامل

Technical Note: Exploring \Sigma^P_2 / \Pi^P_2-hardness for Argumentation Problems with fixed distance to tractable classes

We study the complexity of reasoning in abstracts argumentation frameworks close to a graph classes that allow for efficient reasoning methods, i.e. to one of the classes of acyclic, noeven, biparite and symmetric AFs. In this work we show that certain reasoning problems on the second level of the polynomial hierarchy still maintain their full complexity when restricted to instances of fixed di...

متن کامل

ArgTools: a backtracking-based solver for abstract argumentation

We present ArgTools, a system for reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks. The system solves a number of argumentation problems under preferred, stable, complete and grounded semantics. ArgTools is a C++ implementation of a backtracking algorithm.

متن کامل

Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation

Many reasoning problems involve subproblems that can be solved in different ways. Therefore, hybrid reasoning architectures have long been a research topic in AI. However, most work in this area has either focused on particular combinations of reasoning methods or has ignored the problem of handling alternative solutions to subproblems. The present paper proposes an abstract framework for combi...

متن کامل

Metalogical Contributions to the Nonmonotonic Theory of Abstract Argumentation

The study of nonmonotonic logics is one mayor field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The reason why such kind of formalisms are so attractive to model human reasoning is that they allow to withdraw former conclusion. At the end of the 1980s the novel idea of using argumentation to model nonmonotonic reasoning emerged in AI. Nowadays argumentation theory is a vibrant research area in AI, coverin...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 220  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015